![]() ![]() A mystic speaks in terms of contradictions and paradoxes. You cannot find the same logical consistency in the statements of mystics. There is a great consistency in the statements of Arvind which is not there in statements from supra-rationalism. Everything he says and the words and concepts he uses to say it belong to the grammar of rationalism. Even when he speaks about the transcendence of reason, he uses rationalistic concepts. ![]() What do you say? And do you think that Raman Maharshi’s concept of ajatvad, of unborn reality, is closer to you and to Chaitanya’s concept of achintya bhedabhedvad, or unthinkable dualistic non-dualism?….Īll Arvind’s (Aurobindo) talk of supraconsciousness and the supramental is within the confines of the rational mind. In his concept of the supramental he believes that divine consciousness is going to descend on this earth, but this concept of his seems to be dualistic. From one point of view it is reality that is important, and from another its perception is important. ![]() Questioner: Shree Arvind (Aurobindo) has written a commentary on the Geeta in which he talks about the relationship between the creation and its perception. This talk was from a series that was originally given in Hindi and subsequently translated into English. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |